Portland

Otto!

Since I was already on the west coast I figured I’d visit my brother-in-law Eric in Portland, just a short three hour train ride down the coast from Seattle. This was my first time riding on a train in the United States (at least, since I was about 3-4 years old–I recall riding on a train or something like it when I was very young in Maryland, but other than that I’ve only been on the L in Chicago) and Amtrak was an entirely pleasant experience. The seats were very roomy, the train was clean, and the ride was smooth. The coast was beautiful as well, and someday when I have time to write again I want to dwell on the idea of houses beside the sea and why we are drawn to such tumultuous, tenuous places.

Portland, like Seattle, was not what I had expected it to be. I had never visited the Pacific Northwest but had come to view it with highly romanticized notions of an intellectual mecca coupled with spiritual revival. These two cities seemed like twins to me, centers of intelligent discourse and rational thinking that lent itself to a moderate and educated Christianity. While what I found wasn’t necessarily negative, it failed entirely to live up to my unreasonable expectations.

My self-deception surprised me later because I had already learned this lesson: people are people everywhere. I’ve traveled enough to realize that most everywhere is pretty much the same. You have cars and buildings, restaurants, a mix of educated and ignorant, wealthy and homeless people, and while the ratios may change the basis is the same. Why did I expect these two towns to be different? I have visions in my head of philosophical centers like in ancient Greece, but the truth is that ancient Greece was probably similar to Portland. No place is perfect.

Still, I am glad for the experience, and it was nice visiting Eric. There are a load of pictures over on Flickr, most of which are from a walking tour of the downtown area we took, and I would gladly return to Portland (though probably not to live). I wish my knee hadn’t still been hurting, as it curtailed our exploration of Powell’s Book Store (though on the plus side, that meant I only have to carry 20 extra pounds of books onto the plane!).

More pictures »

Skewed Study Shows Gamers are Fat, Depressed, Possibly Homicidal

A friend of mine shared this through Google Reader and the headline (Video gamers ‘older than thought’) (( I originally read this title as something akin to “Video Gamers Older Than Time and Space.” )) caught my attention. The first three “paragraphs” ((As I copy and paste these “paragraphs,” I realize are really just sentences.)) just frustrated me.

The average age of an adult video game player is 35 – higher than previously thought, a US study suggests.

My goodness! 35 years old and obese, that is quite a concerning figure. I mean, I don’t mind if they’re older–I think it’s good that older people are gaming, as it has been shown to improve and help maintain brain function and hand-eye coordination. I’ve also read anecdotes of grandparents gaming with their grandkids, so that’s cool.

A team from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) also found gamers were less healthy, fatter, and more depressed than non-gamers.

Obesity is certainly a problem though, and for this to be nationwide is alarming.

OK, not terribly alarming, because the entire friggin’ USA is probably “overweight,” at least on average. But whatever, let’s focus on gamers.

Researchers from the government agency analysed data from 500 adults aged 19 to 90 in the Seattle-Tacoma area of Washington state.

Wait… erm, I thought this was to show the average of the United States of America? Instead we’ve got 500 people from Seattle, ((That’s 0.086% of the population of Seattle, by the way, and ((1.64441378 × 10-6)*100)% of the population of the USA.)) a city known for being cloudy and rainy all the freaking time.

Maybe they’re indoors playing games because the weather sucks and they all suffer from SAD. (( Seasonal Anxiety Disorder, which I’m still not convinced is a real disorder.)) Maybe it’s just a poor study.

It’s been said before, but I’ll go ahead and reiterate: Correlation != Causation. This study doesn’t really prove anything. It’s not even worth the HTML it’s printed on.